Category: Film As Visual Literature Studies

  • Bloodlines and Blues: Cultural Consumption and Black Resistance in “Sinners” (2025)

    Mary Mba (Ph.D.)

    This Mother’s Day (2025), my children gifted me an experience I didn’t know I needed: a theater viewing of Sinners (2025), the new genre-defying film directed by Ryan Coogler and starring Michael B. Jordan. It was, in many ways, a spiritual experience. For a few hours, I was not just a mother being celebrated – I was also a daughter remembering, a Black woman reflecting, and a scholar stirred to critical inquiry. My children have formed this ritual of sending me to the theatre to relax and watch movies that just came out, and as usual, this year’s did not disappoint.

    Coogler’s Sinners is not simply a movie. It is a conjuring. A remembering. A ritual of reckoning. And I left the theater knowing I would be writing more about it – not just here on my blog, but in academic journals and cultural essays to come.

    Synopsis: Vampires in the Juke Joint

    Set in 1932 Clarksdale, Mississippi, Sinners follows twin brothers Elijah “Smoke” and Elias “Stack” Moore (both portrayed by Michael B. Jordan), World War I veterans returning home from Chicago to open a juke joint. Joined by their nephew Sammie – a gifted guitarist whose strict preacher father condemns the blues – they hope to build a sanctuary for Black expression, healing, and joy.

    But their haven becomes a battleground. A pale, cold force has come to town: Remmick (Jack O’Connell), an Irish-immigrant vampire who leads a coven of undead musicians. They are drawn not just to blood but to Black vitality – joy, sound, and soul. The struggle to preserve the juke joint becomes a metaphysical war for cultural survival, where music is both weapon and shield, memory and prophecy.

    Major Themes: Blues, Blood, and the Black Soul

    1. Racial Oppression and Cultural Appropriation

    Remmick and his vampire coven represent the centuries-long siphoning of Black culture – by those who consume its art, labor, and rhythm while erasing its originators. The vampires don’t just feed – they curate, repurpose, and dominate.

    2. Spirituality and Resistance

    Far from caricature, African spiritual practices – rootwork, ancestor veneration, sacred drumming – become tools of protection. The film reveres these practices as legitimate, powerful alternatives to Western Christian binaries.

    3. Music as Liberation and Memory

    Blues is not a soundtrack – it is theology. It holds grief and joy together. In Sinners, music raises the dead, opens portals to ancestral wisdom, and confronts the forces of death with the rhythms of life.

    4. Family, Legacy, and Duality

    The Moore twins personify two sides of the Black survival coin: Smoke’s guarded stoicism and Stack’s open-hearted joy. Sammie’s journey reflects the burden of breaking generational expectations to reclaim ancestral power.

    Unspoken Shadows: Subtext and Secondary Themes

    The Model Minority and Complicity

    An Asian couple who own two convenience stores and quietly treat injured Black victims without alerting authorities are framed as “helpful,” but their neutrality masks complicity. Their silence fosters unchecked Black-on-Black violence and reflects the model minority myth: proximity to whiteness and economic benefit, but without disrupting racial hierarchies. They profit from pain and patch up wounds – but never challenge the systems that cause them.

    Eroticism, Whiteness, and Destruction

    One of the twins’ involvement with Mary, a white-passing woman with a one-eighth Black blood, ends in both literal and symbolic death. She is the first to be vampirized – and she turns her Black lover. The tragedy recalls a long lineage of Black male downfall linked to white femininity, not as judgment but as historical commentary. Their intimacy – beautiful and doomed – exposes the dangers of uncritical desire under the white gaze.

    This is not just a personal fall; it is a political echo. Coogler revisits a painful archetype and complicates it, forcing us to ask: What is the cost of loving whiteness when whiteness refuses to love you back?

    Character Analysis: The Living, the Lost, and the Lurking

    Smoke Moore

    Haunted by war and trauma, Smoke is skeptical of both God and man. A World War I veteran, he bears his scars internally and outwardly. His silence is not weakness – it’s a defense mechanism against a world that has rarely made room for Black vulnerability. Yet his loyalty and fierce protectiveness ground the narrative. He is the bruised backbone of the family – guarding the juke joint like sacred ground and embodying a form of masculinity forged in survival, not dominance.

    Stack Moore

    A dreamer, dancer, and emotional heartbeat of the film. Stack believes in the transformative power of joy, music, and community. His expressive nature contrasts Smoke’s reserve, but his refusal to shrink from beauty is its own form of resistance. His downfall – linked to both love and naivete – feels Shakespearean. Yet his arc is also a celebration of art as defiance. His joy is his rebellion, and his memory lingers in every note that follows.

    Sammie

    Caught between a fire-and-brimstone upbringing and the siren call of the blues, Sammie embodies spiritual hybridity. His father’s condemnation of music as “devilish” clashes with Sammie’s intuitive sense that rhythm is healing. His guitar becomes both confessional and altar. His journey is one of self-reclamation, and by the end, Sammie is not just a musician – he is a griot, carrying forward ancestral memory through melody.

    Remmick

    An Irish-immigrant vampire and plantation-era parasite cloaked in elegance. Remmick doesn’t just want to feed – he wants to curate, control, and become what he consumes. His villainy is systemic, not individual. In every smooth smile and calculated charm, he mirrors whiteness’ historical ability to absorb Black genius while remaining untouched by Black pain. He is the colonizer dressed in couture.

    Mary (Stack’s White-passing ex-girlfriend/Lover)

    Mary’s presence is small but devastating. Her relationship with Stack is initially tender, but her transformation into a vampire – and her role in turning Stack – invokes the tragic trope of interracial desire leading to ruin. Her character functions not merely as a symbol of the “forbidden,” but of whiteness-as-desire: beautiful, dangerous, and ultimately, consuming. She does not survive the transformation; neither does the man she loves.

    Annie (Hoodoo Priestess and Spiritual Guardian)

    Annie, portrayed by Wunmi Mosaku, is a powerful Hoodoo priestess and the spiritual heart of the community. Deeply rooted in ancestral wisdom and protective ritual, she embodies a sacred feminine presence that holds space for both personal grief and collective survival. Her history with Smoke – marked by shared loss – adds emotional depth to the film’s themes of memory and mourning.

    Annie’s presence is not limited to ritual scenes; she appears as both a guide and a warning in moments when the juke joint’s sanctity is threatened. Through her rootwork, incantations, and connection to the spirit world, Annie becomes the ancestral channel through which protection flows. She is a reminder that in times of crisis, survival does not rely solely on strength, but on memory, tradition, and sacred knowing.

    Annie doesn’t simply represent spirituality – she enacts it. She is legacy and labor, both mythic and real, reminding us that not all warriors carry weapons. Some carry knowledge. Some carry fire.

    Pastor Elijah (Sammie’s Father)

    A towering figure of moral rigidity. His condemnation of the blues as “the Devil’s music” reflects internalized colonial Christianity. He is not a villain, but a product of spiritual warfare – a man who chose respectability and repression over rhythm and resistance. Yet, there are cracks in his stoicism. His silence after Sammie’s first performance suggests a man wrestling with his own forgotten voice.

    The Asian Shopkeeper CoupleGrace and Bo Chow

    A deeply complicated presence. They treat Black victims of violence without involving the authorities – a gesture of pragmatic care or silent complicity, depending on your read. They profit from the community but do not participate in it. Their quiet neutrality in the face of anti-Black violence exposes the myth of cross-racial solidarity under capitalism, raising questions about the “model minority” role and what it means to be adjacent to, but untouched by, Black suffering.

    Six Theoretical Lenses for Sinners (2025): Reading Horror Through Black, Decolonial, and Feminist Thought

    As a genre-defying Southern Gothic horror film, Sinners is brimming with symbolic and thematic layers. To unpack its richness, I turn to six theoretical frameworks that illuminate the film’s deeper currents – each revealing how horror can be a vessel for truth, trauma, memory, and resistance.

    1. Afropessimism & Afro-Optimism

    Key Scholars: Frank B. Wilderson III, Jared Sexton

    What It Is:
    Afropessimism contends that anti-Blackness is not just a social condition, but an ontological one – Black suffering forms the structural core of Western civilization. Meanwhile, Afro-Optimism insists on survival, joy, and cultural creativity as acts of rebellion and renewal.

    Application in Sinners:
    Vampirism in the film is a near-perfect metaphor for the parasitic relationship between whiteness and Black cultural production. The vampires feed not only on blood, but on soul, rhythm, memory. Blackness becomes a consumable aesthetic – desired, devoured, but never fully humanized. And yet, Sinners doesn’t stop at despair. It insists on the spiritual and creative power of the Black community – through music, ritual, and resistance – as a force that cannot be fully colonized.

    This tension – between what is taken and what refuses to die – sits at the heart of Sinners, mirroring Afropessimism’s realism and Afro-Optimism’s defiant light.

    2. Postcolonial Theory

    Key Scholars: Edward Said, Homi Bhabha, Frantz Fanon

    What It Is:
    Postcolonial theory interrogates the lingering effects of colonialism in cultural, psychological, and material life. It explores how colonized people resist domination and how empire reshapes identity and culture through mimicry, surveillance, and violence.

    Application in Sinners:
    Remmick, the Irish-immigrant vampire, is not a caricature – he is a colonizer who cloaks himself in sophistication and civility, echoing Bhabha’s idea of mimicry and Fanon’s portrait of colonial mental violence. His presence in the Black juke joint is not accidental; it is invasive. He seeks to become what he exploits, dressing in style, learning the music, appropriating the aesthetic while remaining untouched by the trauma that produced it.

    The juke joint becomes a postcolonial battleground – a space of resistance that simultaneously seduces and repels colonial desire.

    3. African Spiritual Epistemologies / Decolonial Theory

    Key Scholars: Sylvia Wynter, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí, Molefi Asante

    What It Is:
    This framework centers African worldviews and cosmologies as legitimate sources of knowledge. It challenges the Eurocentric binaries of good/evil, sin/salvation, and reason/spirit that have historically dismissed Indigenous ways of knowing.

    Application in Sinners:
    The film unapologetically roots its spiritual logic in African traditions – rootwork, ancestor invocation, spiritual possession – not as superstition, but as survival technology. The church calls the juke joint sinful, but the film argues that spirit moves most powerfully in places deemed profane by colonial Christianity.

    Decolonial theory helps us see how blues music, conjure, and oral storytelling become sacred rites. It’s not just about resisting the vampire – it’s about remembering who we are before they arrived. And knowing that the medicine we need is already in our bones.

    4. Critical Race Theory (CRT)

    Key Scholars: Kimberlé Crenshaw, Derrick Bell

    What It Is:
    CRT holds that racism is not aberrational but systemic – embedded in law, policy, culture, and institutional life. It emphasizes intersectionality and questions the narratives of legal neutrality and colorblindness.

    Application in Sinners:
    The juke joint, while a cultural space, is also a legal and political space. It is surveilled. It is threatened. It is coded as “sinful” and thus disposable. Meanwhile, the real predators – like Remmick -operate with impunity.

    The film illustrates how “sin” is racialized. Black joy is pathologized. Black gathering is criminalized. The idea of safety is flipped: within the system, protection is only afforded to the powerful. The juke joint is a site of “illegality,” but also of liberation – where law is replaced by community, care, and rhythm.

    5. Black Feminist Theory

    Key Scholars: bell hooks, Audre Lorde, Hortense Spillers

    What It Is:
    Black feminist theory centers the experiences of Black women and critiques the ways race, gender, sexuality, and class intersect to create unique structures of oppression and resistance.

    Application in Sinners:
    Though the film focuses on the Moore brothers and Sammie, it gestures toward women in critical ways: the mother who raised the boys, the preacher’s wife who shields her son, and Mary – the white lover turned vampire – whose body becomes a vessel of transmission.

    A Black feminist reading asks: Where are the women’s voices? What are the stakes of Black male vulnerability when it is disconnected from Black feminine presence and spiritual labor? What happens when patriarchal values within Black communities – like the condemnation of the blues – silence the very healing traditions women often preserve?

    And what does it mean that the juke joint – coded as feminized, emotional, sensual – is the site of salvation?

    6. Gothic and Horror Theory

    Key Scholars: Toni Morrison (Playing in the Dark), Julia Kristeva (abjection), Jeffrey Jerome Cohen (Monster Theory)

    What It Is:
    Gothic and horror theory explores how monsters embody cultural anxieties, how the grotesque disrupts boundaries, and how horror confronts us with what we repress – historical violence, desire, grief.

    Application in Sinners:
    The vampire is a long-standing symbol in Western horror. In Sinners, it becomes a racialized metaphor for cultural cannibalism. But the film also builds on the Southern Gothic tradition, where the horror lies not in the monster but in the landscape itself – segregated towns, lynching trees, cracked stained glass in empty churches.

    Toni Morrison reminds us that American literature has always used Blackness as a shadow text. Here, that shadow rises fully formed. The vampires are not metaphors instead of history – they are metaphors because of history.

    Similar Films, Shared Bloodlines

    Ryan Coogler’s Sinners (2025) stands at the crossroads of horror, history, spirituality, and resistance. While it offers something wholly original, it also joins a lineage of films and narratives that have used genre – particularly horror, fantasy, and Southern Gothic – to interrogate Black life, survival, and memory.

    The following films share bloodlines with Sinners, echoing its themes and broadening the cultural conversation it participates in:

    Get Out (2017)

    Directed by Jordan Peele

    Like Sinners, Get Out uses the horror genre to expose the deep undercurrents of anti-Blackness within liberal white spaces. Both films deploy supernatural elements – vampires in Sinners, hypnotism and body-snatching in Get Out – as metaphors for the parasitic consumption of Black bodies and minds.

    Comparable Themes:

    • Cultural appropriation as horror
    • White liberalism as masked violence
    • Black autonomy as the true site of fear
    • Racial exploitation framed through genre conventions

    While Get Out focuses on present-day liberalism, Sinners leans more heavily into spirituality and historical grounding, embedding the horror within a Southern, post-WWI Black landscape where the enemy is not just liberalism, but centuries of colonial hunger.

    Eve’s Bayou (1997)

    Directed by Kasi Lemmons

    This Southern Gothic classic explores secrets, spirituality, and family through the eyes of a young Black girl in 1960s Louisiana. Though not horror in the traditional sense, Eve’s Bayou simmers with mystical tension, ancestral presence, and emotional haunting.

    Comparable Themes:

    • Southern Black mysticism
    • Gendered spiritual insight and repression
    • Family secrets and inherited trauma
    • The thin veil between life, death, and legacy

    While Sinners focuses on male protagonists, it shares Eve’s Bayou‘s investment in Black Southern spiritual knowledge – especially the idea that what is seen and unseen are constantly in conversation.

    Blade (1998)

    Directed by Stephen Norrington, starring Wesley Snipes

    Blade redefined the vampire genre by centering a Black protagonist who hunts vampires instead of being their victim. It merges action with horror and unapologetically repositions Black masculinity as powerful, strategic, and supernatural.

    Comparable Themes:

    • Black resistance against predatory whiteness
    • Vampirism as a symbol of elitism, corruption, and racial supremacy
    • Weaponized Black bodies as sites of reclamation

    While Blade is more action-based, Sinners slows the tempo, inviting reflection on the spiritual implications of the vampire metaphor – how whiteness feeds on Black expression while simultaneously vilifying it.

    The Harder They Fall (2021)

    Directed by Jeymes Samuel

    A bold revisionist Western that centers Black gunslingers and reclaims a genre that historically erased Black presence. The film subverts tropes and injects style, swagger, and revenge into a narrative about family, justice, and legacy.

    Comparable Themes:

    • Genre revision through a Black historical lens
    • Revenge as justice
    • Mythmaking and narrative power
    • Radical style as a vehicle for radical truth

    Both films rewrite genre from within. Sinners does for Southern Gothic horror what The Harder They Fall does for the Western – disrupts, centers Blackness, and elevates aesthetic form into historical testimony.

    Beloved (1998)

    Directed by Jonathan Demme, based on the novel by Toni Morrison

    A deeply haunting narrative rooted in post-slavery trauma, maternal grief, and memory as both gift and curse. Beloved reveals how history refuses to stay buried—and how the past lives on in the body and spirit.

    Comparable Themes:

    • Haunting as historical echo
    • Motherhood, grief, and ancestral return
    • Spiritual possession and unresolved trauma
    • The horror of survival, not death

    Coogler’s film similarly explores what it means to be haunted by history – not only by loss, but by the vampiric systems that refuse to release Black communities. And like Morrison’s work, Sinners treats the supernatural not as escapism, but as revelation.

    Final Thought

    Each of these films dares to envision Blackness not only as a site of suffering – but also as a source of power, magic, creativity, and cosmological depth. Sinners earns its place among them by building a rich, blood-soaked altar at the crossroads of horror and history. It demands not just to be watched, but to be remembered.

    What Comes Next: Scholarship and Reflection

    Sinners didn’t just entertain me – it unsettled, provoked, and ultimately activated something deep within. It stirred memory. It stirred inquiry. It called forth not only the ghosts of the past, but the voices of theory, music, and ancestral witness that have long lived in my academic and personal work.

    This film demands a response, not only as a viewer, but as a cultural critic and scholar. Over the coming months, I will be expanding on the ideas seeded in this reflection – developing essays and academic articles that explore the film’s cultural, spiritual, and political dimensions through multiple critical lenses. Please, let me know in the comment section, the one or ones you would like me to develop first.

    Works in Progress:

    1. “Bloodlines and Blues: African Spirituality and Resistance in Sinners
      A study of how African cosmologies and ritual practices are reclaimed as legitimate epistemologies and survival strategies within the film.
    2. “Vampires and the Plantation: Gothic Capitalism in Black Horror Cinema”
      A comparative exploration of how vampirism functions as a metaphor for racial capitalism, extraction, and consumption in Sinners, Get Out, and Beloved.
    3. “The Juke Joint as Sacred Space: Reimagining Sin and Spirit through Black Sound”
      An analysis of how the juke joint disrupts colonial notions of sin and sanctity, positioning blues music as theology, ritual, and resistance.
    4. “Twins, Trauma, and the Black Masculine Psyche: A Character Study of Smoke and Stack”
      A psychological and symbolic examination of how duality, war trauma, and masculine identity are represented through the twin protagonists.
    5. “Desire and Destruction: Race, Eroticism, and the White Gaze in Sinners
      A critical look at interracial desire, betrayal, and the dangers of romantic proximity to whiteness within the racialized horror tradition.
    6. “Model Minorities and Mute Complicity: Cross-Racial Tensions in Black Horror”
      A provocative interrogation of how Asian characters are positioned as silent enablers of anti-Black violence in Sinners, and what this reveals about racial hierarchy and cultural proximity.

    These forthcoming pieces are not just academic – they are offerings. Rituals of clarity. Testimonies stitched together from blood, basslines, and Black memory. Sinners will not leave us alone – and that, I believe, is the point.

    Final Reflections: A Mother’s Gift, A Scholar’s Joy

    I didn’t plan to watch Sinners. I was gifted the experience.

    This Mother’s Day, my children gave me something profound: not flowers, not chocolates, but the gift of story – a seat in a dark theater to witness Ryan Coogler’s Sinners unfold on screen. But it wasn’t just the film itself that moved me – it was everything that came after.

    On the drive home, my son and I dove headfirst into discussion, dissecting symbolism, drawing cultural parallels, and naming the characters’ choices out loud like we were building a syllabus in real time. We were breathless with ideas – teasing out metaphors, asking what it meant for Blackness to be desired and devoured, and what it meant to resist through music.

    Later that evening, my daughter called, and the conversation picked up with even more intensity. We talked about gender and spiritual legacy, about the vampire as a stand-in for systemic power, about blues as theology and survival, about the role of the Asian couple and the one-eighth Black white woman. I learned from her that Hailee Steinfeld, who played the role of Mary, Stack’s ex-girlfriend who passes for white in the film, is also one-eight Black in real life. Our voices spilled over with excitement, the kind that only comes from being seen and intellectually engaged at the same time.

    These are the moments I cherish most. Not just because they show how deeply we think as a family – but because they are proof of love. Love in the form of thoughtful conversation. Love in the form of a movie ticket. Love in the form of listening, reflecting, and wrestling with meaning together.

    To my children: I love you more than I can say. Thank you for seeing me – for knowing that this, this blend of spirit, story, cinema, and critical inquiry, is what makes me come alive. Thank you for meeting me there. For gifting me a Mother’s Day of deep joy, of shared thought, of laughter and fire and revelation.

    This blog post is also yours. Your voices are here.
    Your questions live in every paragraph.
    Your hearts echo in every line.

    Sinners reminded me that horror is often just another word for memory. That resistance can sound like a guitar riff. That history lives in both blood and breath.

    It also reminded me that the ancestors are watching.
    And so are we.
    And thanks to you – my beloved children – I’m watching with fuller vision, an open mind, and a grateful, overflowing heart.

    Sinners – Official Trailer | IMDb

    Sinners – Official Trailer | IMDb

    References:

    Films & Media:

    Coogler, Ryan, director. Sinners. Performance by Michael B. Jordan, Jack O’Connell, 2025.

    Demme, Jonathan, director. Beloved. Performance by Oprah Winfrey, Danny Glover, and Thandiwe Newton, Touchstone Pictures, 1998.

    Lemmons, Kasi, director. Eve’s Bayou. Trimark Pictures, 1997.

    Norrington, Stephen, director. Blade. Performance by Wesley Snipes, New Line Cinema, 1998.

    Peele, Jordan, director. Get Out. Universal Pictures, 2017.

    Samuel, Jeymes, director. The Harder They Fall. Netflix, 2021.

    Books & Theoretical Sources:

    Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. Routledge, 1994.

    Bell, Derrick. Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. Basic Books, 1992.

    Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, 1991, pp. 1241–1299.

    Fanon, Frantz. Black Skin, White Masks. Translated by Richard Philcox, Grove Press, 2008.

    hooks, bell. Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. South End Press, 1981.

    Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez, Columbia University Press, 1982.

    Morrison, Toni. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. Harvard University Press, 1992.

    Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Vintage Books, 1979.

    Sexton, Jared. “Afro-Pessimism: The Unclear Word.” Rhizomes, vol. 29, 2016.

    Spillers, Hortense J. “Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book.” Diacritics, vol. 17, no. 2, 1987, pp. 65–81.

    Wilderson, Frank B., III. Afropessimism. Liveright, 2020.

    Wynter, Sylvia. “Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom.” The New Centennial Review, vol. 3, no. 3, 2003, pp. 257–337.

  • Immortal and Undone: Beauty, Power, and the Women Who Refuse to Die

    By Mary Mba (Ph.D.)

    When I was a child, Mom was a teacher and had a rich collection of literary work that I always got lost in as my escape. One of the memorable books I read was She—not just the first novel, but the entire trilogy: She, Ayesha: The Return of She, and Wisdom’s Daughter. I didn’t fully understand the cultural implications then, but I was captivated. Ayesha was beautiful, wise, terrifying, and unyielding. She ruled. She didn’t apologize. She lived for thousands of years, and her story stayed with me for decades.

    Years later, while teaching Death Becomes Her in my Women in Film course, I began to see it differently and would often reference Haggard’s She in my classes. I’d shown the film many times as an example of visual satire, camp, and gender performance—but something clicked. The themes of fear, beauty, power, and punishment weren’t just superficial. They echoed the same cultural anxieties I had first encountered in She. And so, this paper—and this blog post—was born.

    “She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed”: A Name I Know Too Well

    Over the years, I’ve been called that—“She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed”—not as a compliment, but as an attempt to silence me. To mock my defiance, my curiosity, and my penchant for being a critical and logical thinker. To punish my refusal to bow to illogic or perform submissiveness so unquestioningly. But here’s the irony: they called me that not because I refused to obey—because I asked critical questions, thought outside the box, was creative, pushed boundaries, had a can-do attitude, refused to just conform, and stepped out of line – to improve on and do it even better.

    Just like Ayesha.
    Just like Lisle.

    Two Immortal Women, A World of Fear

    In She (1887), H. Rider Haggard introduces Ayesha: a veiled, ancient queen who rules over the lost African kingdom of Kôr. She’s more than beautiful—she’s unbearable to behold. Her gaze kills. Her voice commands armies. But she is also an Orientalist fantasy: white and wise, ruling over “uncivilized” African subjects, her power derived from a mystical fire hidden deep in the heart of Africa.

    The novel is a product of British colonial anxiety—a time when the empire was both expanding and crumbling, and Victorian masculinity was obsessed with controlling the “wild” unknown. Ayesha, therefore, is the feminine Other: desired and feared, powerful and dangerous, and ultimately undone by the very mystery that defines her.

    Fast forward to Death Becomes Her (1992). Lisle von Rhuman is just as commanding—an immortal beauty who seduces aging celebrities with a potion of eternal youth. Her appearance is coded as exotic but sanitized: a vaguely Mediterranean accent, long flowing gowns, Middle Eastern décor, and a surreal, ageless presence. She lives in a palatial Beverly Hills estate that could double as a temple. Her power, like Ayesha’s, is spiritualized, sexualized, and elusive. We never really know where she’s from. That’s the point. She is Othered, but safely packaged for the Western gaze.

    The Psychology of Glamorous Entrapment

    From a psychoanalytic view, Ayesha and Lisle embody the Freudian death drive—they don’t grow or evolve, they just loop: around obsession, vanity, loss, and denial. Their beauty is a trap. Their immortality? A gilded coffin.

    In Lacanian terms, their reflection becomes their prison. They’re stuck performing an ideal version of themselves, and that performance… slowly falls apart.

    From Freud to Lacan to Kristeva, the psychology in both stories is clear: these women are trapped in the mirror. Immortality is not a gift—it’s a loop. Ayesha can’t move on from her past. Lisle is frozen in her aesthetic present. And Madeline and Helen—Lisle’s customers—become grotesque dolls, eternally reapplying paint over decay.

    Enter Julia Kristeva. In her theory of abjection, she describes the abject as what we try to cast off in order to be “clean,” “whole,” or “civilized.” It’s the stuff that blurs boundaries—between life and death, self and other, inside and outside. It’s vomit, blood, rot… or a woman whose neck is twisted backward but still walks in heels. In both She and Death Becomes Her, the immortal body becomes abject: a horrifying, leaking symbol of what must be expelled to maintain order—but that refuses to go quietly.

    These women don’t live forever.
    They perform forever.
    And in doing so, they become both icons… and abjections.

    Power + Punishment = The Price of Being “Too Much”

    Ayesha and Lisle are punished not because they’re evil—but because they’re too powerful. Too commanding. Too unapologetic. Too unknowable. The narratives demand their collapse to restore patriarchal order.

    Madeline and Helen, meanwhile, are punished for aging, then punished for refusing to age. Their co-dependent decay isn’t just grotesque—it’s a satire of how society turns women into rivals, then cannibalizes them.

    The Exotic Immortal and the Colonial Gaze

    Ayesha’s African empire is visually lush but racially caricatured. Her dark-skinned servants speak in broken English. The white male explorers see her as goddess and monster, mother and mistress. Her femininity is both the height of allure and the reason she must be destroyed.

    Lisle may not be “colonial” in the traditional sense, but she’s no less coded. She’s timeless, foreign, and unknowable. Her immortality is portrayed as forbidden knowledge—like ancient wisdom stolen from temples—and her body is marked not by race, but by exotic performance. She’s the kind of Other that Hollywood adores: seductive, mysterious, and conveniently unattached to any real cultural identity.

    Camp, Queer Time, and Living on the Edge of Decay

    Of course, Death Becomes Her doesn’t just lean into satire—it leans into camp. Stilettos on corpses. Lipstick on broken necks. Sequins over splinters. It’s fabulous and horrifying, and queer scholars have long celebrated it for refusing naturalism. The women don’t die. They don’t grow. They just exist, unnaturally and unapologetically.

    And that, too, is a kind of resistance.

    Ayesha is camp, too—in her high drama, her divine pronouncements, her robes and rituals. She is queen, priestess, diva, and drag.

    What Do We See in the Mirror?

    When I look at Ayesha and Lisle, I don’t just see fictional women—I see reflections of cultural obsessions. I see what we do to powerful women who don’t conform. I see the fear of aging, the punishment of visibility, and the danger of desire unbound.

    But I also see possibility. Performance. Resistance. A touch of the divine.

    💬 Let’s Talk

    This blog post reflects just a portion of my full academic paper:
    📖 *“The Immortal, the Vain, and the Undone: A Comparative Analysis of H. Rider Haggard’s She and Death Becomes Her”
    🗣️ What does immortality mean to you?
    👁️‍🗨️ What are you refusing to let die?
    💅🏾 And what version of you lives forever in the mirror?

  • She Who Must Be Obeyed: Beauty, Power, and the Divine Feminine in Death Becomes Her

    By Mary Mba, Ph.D.

    I’ve watched Death Becomes Her more times than I can count. I’ve taught it in my Women in Film classes for years, always amazed at how this glammed-up, campy 1992 film sparks such serious conversations about aging, beauty, power, and the lengths women are asked to go to remain visible.

    But the older I get—and the deeper I dive into stories of monstrous women, divine mothers, and witches with impossible grace—the more one character in this film stands out to me:

    Not Madeline Ashton.

    Not Helen Sharp.

    But Lisle von Rhoman.

    Swathed in silk, nearly nude, adorned with gold and mystery, Lisle floats into the story like a postmodern goddess. She’s played by Isabella Rossellini with the grace of an immortal and the gaze of someone who knows you will obey her—or suffer. And she offers something no woman in the real world is supposed to have: eternal youth.

    Of course, there’s a catch. There’s always a catch.

    “Take care of yourself,” she tells Madeline. “You and your body are going to be together a long time. Be good to it.”

    “You may continue your career for ten years… but at the end of that time, before people become suspicious, you have to disappear from public view forever.”

    That line always makes me pause.

    We’re taught that beauty is visibility. That the reward for being young, slim, flawless, is to be seen. But what Death Becomes Her shows us—what Lisle teaches—is that in this system, beauty also requires erasure. You can stay beautiful… but only if no one sees you fall apart. And when that time comes, you’re expected to vanish.

    It’s a terrifying deal. And yet, doesn’t it feel familiar?

    The Goddess in the Algorithm

    Lisle’s candlelit temple, her magical elixir, her immortality rituals—they might seem far from the world of filters, ring lights, and celebrity skin routines. But they’re not. Her logic lives on in today’s beauty apps, in TikTok transformations, in the $60 billion cosmetic industry that turns aging into failure and transformation into endless labor.

    Makeup has become modern magic. People sculpt entire new faces daily. Drag queens remind us that gender, like youth, is something you can paint. Women in their 60s are going viral for reversing time with contour. The same power Lisle holds—the power of illusion—is now available in every Sephora and on every phone screen.

    But the pressure remains.

    Maintain yourself.

    Be careful.

    Don’t crack.

    Global Goddesses, Real Monsters

    Lisle isn’t alone in media history. Across African, Asian, and Latin American cultures, we’ve always had powerful feminine spirits. Mami Wata, La Llorona, witches who resist marriage or bear scars of survival. In films like I Am Not a Witch, Mami Wata (2023), or Onibaba, the female body becomes sacred, dangerous, ungovernable.

    These women don’t always maintain themselves. Sometimes, they rot. Sometimes, they fight. Sometimes, they scream. But they never disappear quietly.

    That’s what makes them monstrous—and that’s what makes them divine.

    When the Mask Doesn’t Come Off

    What Death Becomes Her leaves us with isn’t horror or comedy—it’s a question: What happens when the body is no longer yours, but a performance?

    As I revisit this film with students, with friends, with myself, I see Lisle not as a villain, but as a warning. She who must be obeyed is also she who must be feared. She offers power. But it’s not freedom. It’s maintenance. And behind every mirror in her temple is a woman who will one day fall apart.

    So maybe the question isn’t how to stay young forever.

    Maybe it’s this:

    What does it mean to be seen—truly seen—even as we change?

    And how do we write ourselves into a story where we don’t disappear?

  • Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark: Real Monsters, Political Horror, Fear, and the Fight for Truth

    Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark: Real Monsters, Political Horror, Fear, and the Fight for Truth

    By Mary Mba, Ph.D.

    Scary Stories, Real Monsters: Political

    When Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark hit theaters in 2019, I remember walking out of the theatre with chills—not just from the film’s haunted monsters, but from the eerie resonance it had with real life. I quickly bought the entire three volumes of the book – because, I am that much of a book lover! Set in 1968 America—a time of war, protest, and political fear—the movie felt like a mirror reflecting our present, especially under Donald Trump’s administration. Watching it again now, in 2025, the mirror feels even sharper.

    Directed by André Øvredal and produced by Guillermo del Toro, the film is based on the cult-classic book series by Alvin Schwartz, notorious for its eerie tales and unforgettable illustrations. Set in 1968, the movie follows a group of teenagers who stumble upon a haunted book that begins writing new horror stories—stories that come true and target them one by one. But what begins as supernatural terror quickly reveals deeper truths: the danger of silence, the violence of misinformation, and the haunting power of stories told to protect the powerful and punish the marginalized.

    This is more than a horror movie. It’s a metaphor. A warning. A map of how fear, when turned into story, becomes power.

    Now, in 2025, with the resurgence of policies and rhetoric built on exclusion and fear, the film feels frighteningly prophetic.

    Haunted Books and Presidential Narratives

    In the film, a haunted book writes people into their deaths. The monster isn’t just Sarah Bellows, the ghost writing these tales—it’s the story itself. That’s where I saw the clearest parallel. During Trump’s first presidency, and now again, we’ve witnessed a flood of false, fear-driven narratives: immigrants as invaders, cities as war zones, the “other” as threat. These aren’t just political strategies—they are scary stories.

    And like in the film, the stories became real. Families were separated. ICE raids terrorized neighborhoods. DEI programs are now being banned. Schools are being forced to erase truth to protect power. At Haskell Indian Nations University, students lost teachers, coaches, and access to classes because of federally imposed cuts. Even some of Trump’s supporters are now losing their jobs. The stories don’t spare anyone in the end.

    Spiders Under the Skin: COVID, Contagion, and the Fear of Infestation

    One of the most disturbing scenes in the film is when a girl’s red spot explodes with spiders—an infestation no one saw coming. It’s a perfect metaphor for COVID-19. During the pandemic, fear of infection turned into racial hatred, especially against Asian Americans. Trump’s use of the term “China Virus” fueled hate crimes and conspiracy theories. The fear wasn’t just of the virus—it was of people. That’s how horror works: it dehumanizes first, then attacks.

    Monsters and Moral Panic

    The Jangly Man. Harold the Scarecrow. The Pale Lady. These monsters represent institutional violence, bureaucratic horror, and systemic fear. But the real monster? The book. The story. Because once a lie is told often enough, it writes itself into law.

    The monsters today wear new faces: “voter fraud,” “CRT,” “wokeness,” “illegals,” “replacement theory.” All scary stories written to justify real harm. And just like in the film, these monsters keep reappearing until we rewrite the story.

    The Gospel of Fear: Evangelical Narratives and Political Mythmaking

    Here’s where things get even deeper—and scarier.

    In The Plague by Albert Camus, Father Paneloux, a devout priest, tells his congregation that the deadly epidemic is a punishment from God for their sins. He preaches certainty. Judgment. But after witnessing the slow, agonizing death of a child, his theology begins to fracture. He offers a second sermon, filled not with answers, but with anguish. “We must love what we cannot understand,” he says, no longer able to justify suffering with spiritual logic.

    Now, think of Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark. The town of Mill Valley casts Sarah Bellows as a witch, a monster, a vessel of evil. Her story becomes gospel—passed down, accepted, unchallenged. But the truth? Sarah was a scapegoat, silenced by her powerful family to protect their reputation. The town believed the lie because it was easier than facing the truth.

    This is the same pattern we see in American evangelical narratives around Trump. For years, prominent religious leaders declared him a divine instrument—a flawed but chosen vessel sent by God to save the nation. His policies, no matter how harmful, were spiritualized. Wrapped in prophecy. Justified with scripture.

    But now, as cuts to global health programs, aid organizations, and basic humanitarian services take effect—even those who once defended him are starting to feel the fallout. The suffering can no longer be hidden. Just like Father Paneloux. Just like the people of Mill Valley. The story is cracking.

    And here’s the hard truth: when fear becomes theology, monsters are born. When the gospel is used to silence, scapegoat, and justify cruelty—it stops being gospel at all. It becomes horror.

    So we must ask:

    • What kind of savior harms those he claims to protect?
    • What kind of story makes monsters of the innocent?

    It’s time to stop reading the same haunted script. It’s time to write something better.

    Rewriting the Story

    In the end, Stella doesn’t kill Sarah Bellows. She listens. She writes a new story—one based on truth. That’s what we’re being asked to do now.

    Camus called it “common decency.” I call it courageous storytelling. We have to tell the truth, especially when it’s uncomfortable. We have to protect our most vulnerable, especially when they’re being erased. And we have to remember: narratives are not neutral. They can kill. But they can also heal.

    The monsters aren’t just on screen. They’re in headlines, laws, policies, pulpits. But so is the pen.

    And we’re still holding it.

    💬 Share Your Thoughts

    Have you seen Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark? Did you see the parallels too? I’d love to hear your thoughts. Leave a comment or share this with someone who needs to read it.

    #Storytelling #HorrorAsMetaphor #EquityInEducation #Camus #AcademicLeadership #ScaryStoriesToTellInTheDark #AntiRacism #DEI #LinkedInThoughtLeadership